Storing Collections in Session vs com objects

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Storing Collections in Session vs com objects

  1. #1
    JEB Guest

    Default Storing Collections in Session vs com objects

    Up until now, I&#039ve made the mistake of storing the dictionary object in a session variable. I gather storing COM in the session is Not Recommended. As an alternative, would a collection returned from a VB component be acceptable to store in the session ?<BR><BR>Thanks for any feedback<BR><BR>JEB

  2. #2
    Ian Stallings Guest

    Default RE: Storing Collections in Session vs com objects

    Since a VB collection is basically an array stored in ram<BR>there would be no need for this. It wouldn&#039t be as efficient<BR>as just calling the collection.<BR><BR>does this help?

  3. #3
    JEB Guest

    Default RE: Storing Collections in Session vs com objects

    Unfortunately I&#039ve just been told that Collections are COM as as well.. DOH!. .. So I can&#039t store them in Session either. &#060;sigh&#062; .. back to the drawing board.. Thanks anyway

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •